Michael Obama as a Racialist

Note: Written 10/15/16

A few days ago Michele Obama made a passionate condemnation of Donald Trump, insinuating that he was a disgusting human being, a sexual predator (that is, a felon), and his being was slightly lower than that of an insect. He was totally unfit to be President, in fact, totally unfit to even be in her presence.

His repulsive behavior was that in the last 30 years, there have been around seven allegations that he sexually “assaulted” women without their permission: he kissed them on the lips; he touched (“grappled”) them “all over,” he hugged them; and he put his hands up one woman’s skirt, even touching her vagina through her panties.

Michele gave an authentic speech. She shivered emotionally as she described how she couldn’t get it out of her mind how Trump told a reporter, in a private conversation, that her periodically grabbed women’s “p****.” Only a sick, demented person would talk like that. It was an indescribable crime to talk about women as if they were sexual objects.

 Trump’s hope of every winning the election were trashed after the first Presidential debate with Hillary Clinton, where Trump didn’t fully prepare for the debate and embarrassed himself. (See article). However, Michele’s speech clinched Hillary’s win. Even if a miracle happened (like some Russian hack-job released emails showing that Hillary was even less qualified than him), Trump probably couldn’t perform as President with such hatred towards him. He would probably be impeached.

Everyone joined in with Michele condemnation of Trump’s “locker room talk,” both the Progressives and the Conservatives. Even Utah might now vote for Hillary. Only the loyal Trump supporters didn’t condemn him.

Politicians and political pundits were saying, “How could we have a President when I couldn’t even allow my children to be near him.” And, “We should put the words, “P***y” and “c**t” on the same prohibitive list as the racist word, “n****r,” for these sexist words are treating women like objects in the same way that the “n*****” word is treating blacks like inferior people.

This is the feminist inquisition and the Progressive inquisition in all its glory.

They have found the toothpick in white men’s soul and want to utterly condemn it. A white man saying these prohibited words, even in a private conversation is utterly prohibitive. He will be destroyed if he is found out.

The same is true if any white man kisses, hugs, or fondles a woman without her permission. He should be labeled a “sexual predator” and treated just like a child molester or a rapist who beats, rapes, and kills a woman. And don’t even talk about reaching under her skirt.

(Giving a woman an unwanted kiss was a common scene in romantic movies from the 1920′ through the 1950’s.)

The Progressives have made the standard liberal fallacy: seeing the world through rose colored glasses.  This is except for the evil one: in this case, the white male. They argue that Trump using the filthy word “p***y” in private conversation was not locker room talk. It was the talk of a demented person.

Male athletes never talk like that! Neither do high school boys, nor construction workers. As Senator McCain implied, neither do soldiers. Search the million man military far and wide, and you will never hear a soldier use the word “p***y” nor “c**t.” Also you will never hear a soldier talk about a woman in sexual terms, but only discuss women with the upmost respect. Not our men in uniform!

So far so good. We have our Progressive work cut out for us. Certainly we don’t want to have Michele Obama or other women repulsed by the perversions of men like Donald Trump. Let’s all work together (like Hillary says) and clean the minds, the tongues, and the behaviors of those filthy white men.

Now that we have collectively made a decision to clean up the minds and souls of white men, let’s take a look at black men.

From the 1970’s until the present time, rap music has had a significant influence, not only on American culture, but world culture as well – since all areas of U.S. culture has such an impact on world culture. (Yes, whether we want it or not, we are world leaders.)

But while, condemning a whole segment of white thought – labeled “white supremacy” or “racism,” many rap singers arrogate to themselves the right to “sing” anything. They are free! Free from white control and white ethics. (That is, they are free from the cultural norms of Western Civilization, especially the norms of Judeo-Christianity – the basis of Western Civilization.)

Many rap singers have celebrated the antithesis to Western Civilization – that is, barbarism and pre-civil culture. They wrote lyrics to the rap music beat – a beat that took the world by storm – which celebrated and encouraged such thoughts and behaviors as: fornication, murder, assault, theft, drug use, illegal behavior, hatred of cops, misogyny, black racism, general hatred, violent anger, and black male superiority.

Throughout the 1990’s there was even the popularity of “Gangsta Rap,” where the lifestyle of the culture of racist criminals and illegal gangs was celebrated and encouraged.

One rationalization for this burst of “creativity” is one of the basic tenets of the theology of the god of free enterprise:

If it makes money, it is morally good.

Since these rappers made millions and were cheered by millions of fans, including  white suburban fans — who were the majority of their fans (I mean, what red-blooded teenage kid doesn’t want to overthrow the legal system and do whatever the f*** he wants). Thus what the rappers were singing had to be right. The whole free-enterprise system said so.

The rappers were only exercising their right of free speech and their fans were freely choosing to buy it. What is more American than this?

Of course any antithesis to black barbaric rap is the ultimate of evil: white racism. The least criticism of pre-civil rap lyrics is condemned as “unconscious racism,” and “micro-aggression.”

In my memory, I can’t recall one instance when Michele criticized sociopathic lyrics commonly found in African American rap music. For some, unknown reason, these lyrics don’t have the same emotional effect on Michele as does Trump using the p**** word in a private conversation.

Here is one example of pre-civil lyrics by two of the top and the most respected rappers in America, Jay Z and Kayne West. It’s from the “song,” Niggas in Paris: 

She said, “Ye, can we get married in the mall?”

I said, “Look, you need to crawl ‘fore you ball

Come and meet me in the bathroom stall

And show me why you deserve to have it all

(Ball so hard) That shit cray that shit cray, ain’t it Jay?

…..

“Your whip so cold so cold” – this old thing?

(Ball so hard)

Act like you’ll ever be around mothafuckers like this again

Bougie girl, grab my hand

Fuck that bitch; she don’t wanna dance

See full lyrics.

(See lyrics of other rappers on genius.com.)

And these lyrics are proudly shouted out in front of thousands of screaming fans, men and women. Compare this to Trump using the p**** word in a private conversation, which unnerves Michele to her very core.

The oppressed can speak freely 

Just as in the black con, where African Americans can use the “N” word freely, but a European American can have his career ended by using the word, in the feminist con, women are free use the “p****” word but men are condemned for using it.

There is a current book out by a feminist, titled P****. The book discusses how women should say “good morning” to their p**** every morning and daily stimulate it, to the point where she will be “radiant” with sexual energy throughout the day. Of course, if a man reacts to this “radiance” with an unwanted glimpse or an unwanted statement he is guilty of being a sexual predator.

The barbaric speak with bullhorns and the civil speak in hushed whispers.

Eddie’s theory

My hypothesis is the reason Michele shivered with anger over Trump using the p***** word and has had virtually no emotional response over misogynist rap lyrics is “unconscious racism,” just what the black con argues most whites have. This psychological phenomenon can also be called “racialism” because it pertains to race but it has no hatred.

Trump using the p**** word may have emotionally brought up all the hurt and pain whites have cause in Michele’s life (along with all the honor they have brought her), and perhaps, she has less hurt and pain that has been caused by anti-social black men.

Emotionally she is demanding of white men just what the black con and the feminist con is demanding of white men: absolute moral purity. As Jesus commands, white men (as well as others) shouldn’t even have an impure sexual thought.

Meanwhile, just as the black con claims: black men are free to say whatever they want. They are already morally pure by definition. Any imperfection in the rap singer’s personality is caused by the social and economic environment in which he was raised, an environment caused by white people (“the system”).

Conclusion

Blacks and whites, and every other person in the world — including men and women — have the same moral responsibilities. This is regardless of their past history or their current suffering.

In the first 300 years of Christianity, when believers of Jesus were getting executed by the thousands, no religious leader said, “All right, I understand your anger. So now you can do anything thing you want.” (The moral blank check.)

Virtually every mainline religion throughout history – and certainly Christianity – has said the same thing. The poor, the oppressed, and the suffering, throughout history, have never been given this blank check. And the virtuous among them have never arrogated the moral blank check to themselves.  They have accepted the same moral responsibility as everyone else.  And, in fact, usually the poor, the oppressed and the suffering have been more moral than the rich.

(And we can include virtually all Americans, including virtually all African Americans, as being rich, when compared with the poverty and suffering of people throughout history.)